Category Blog

Ten Tips to Better Job Aids

Job Aid Template

In a continuously evolving performance environment, job aids can be indispensable resources, offering point of need support to individuals as they navigate the intricacies of their roles. These tools come in various forms, from simple checklists and instructional guides to interactive digital platforms, each designed to streamline processes and boost efficiency. Not all job aids are created equal and so we have identified ten things to consider when designing a job aid.

  1. Clarity and Simplicity: A job aid should be clear and easy to understand. It should use simple language and avoid unnecessary jargon or complex terminology. The instructions or information provided should be concise and to the point, making it easy for users to grasp and apply the content quickly.
  2. Relevance: A job aid should be directly applicable to the tasks at hand. It should focus on providing the specific information or guidance required to complete a task or solve a problem. Irrelevant or extraneous details can confuse users and diminish the effectiveness of the aid.
  3. Accessibility: The job aid should be easily accessible to the individuals who need it. It could be in the form of a physical document, an electronic file, or an online resource. Accessibility also includes factors such as ensuring the aid is available in the appropriate language, format, and location.
  4. Visual Presentation: Utilize visuals such as diagrams, flowcharts, tables, or illustrations to enhance understanding. Visual aids can simplify complex concepts, clarify processes, and provide a quick overview of information. Well-designed visuals can make the job aid more engaging and easier to follow.
  5. User-Focused Design: Consider the needs and preferences of the target audience when designing the job aid. Understand their skill levels, prior knowledge, and preferred learning styles. Tailor the aid accordingly, using formats and structures that align with the users’ characteristics.
  6. Step-by-Step Guidance: When applicable, provide a step-by-step approach or a sequential process to guide users through the task or problem-solving process. This helps users follow a logical sequence and reduces the chances of errors or confusion.
  7. Contextual Examples: Include relevant examples or case studies to illustrate how the job aid can be applied in real-life situations. Examples help users understand the practical application of the information and provide a reference point for their own work.
  8. Regular Updates and Maintenance: Job aids should be periodically reviewed, updated, and improved based on user feedback and changing job requirements. Outdated or inaccurate information can hinder performance and lead to mistakes.
  9. Compatibility with Workflow: The job aid should seamlessly integrate into the existing workflow and not disrupt productivity. It should be readily available at the point of need, allowing users to access and refer to it easily during their work tasks.
  10. Training and Familiarization: Proper training and orientation on how to effectively use the job aid can significantly enhance its effectiveness. Users should be familiar with the purpose, content, and structure of the aid to maximize its value.

Brief History of ADDIE: Part 1

Illustration of the ADDIE model
The Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model was developed in the 1970s, for the Army by the Center for Educational Technology at Florida State University. The Army was looking for a systematic approach to training during this period, and thus commissioned the Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development (IPISD) for the military. The core concepts of IPISD revolved around the five phases that would later become known as ADDIE.

After the formalization of the ADDIE model, it became evident that the systematic approach had applications beyond military training. During the 1980s and 1990s, the structured ADDIE process as we know it was began being integrated into industry, universities and K-12 education. This integration was not necessarily uniform across all organizations. The adoption was driven by local initiatives, state policies, and the growth of instructional technology and design as a discipline.

The rise of e-learning and online education in the 1990’s and 2000’s brought renewed focus on systematic instructional design. As military organizations, industry, universities and colleges started to create or expand their online course offerings, the principles of ADDIE became even more relevant.

The ADDIE model has continued to influence curriculum development adapting and evolving with technological and pedagogical advancements. Various iterations or modifications of the ADDIE model have been developed to better suit the specific needs of different educational contexts.

The original IPISD reports are available on the Defense Technical Information Center. We have provided links below to the PDF copies maintained at their website.


IPISD. Executive Summary and Model

The report is a five-volume set of procedures developed for the preparation of a curriculum when interservice training is called for. The procedures address five major phases, which are analyze, design, develop, implement, and control. The procedures begin with methodology for conducting a job analysis for the curriculum subject area for which the instruction is to be developed and go through 18 additional steps suitable for the empirical development of interservice training. This volume contains a summary and model.

IPISD. Phase 1. Analysis

The analysis phase of interservice training curriculum development includes the establishment of job performance standards, task discrimination to separate important ones from the unimportant ones, construction of tests to determine ability to perform tasks, examination of existing courses for effectiveness, and selection of an optimum instructional setting for a given task.

IPISD. Phase 2. Design

The design phase of interservice training curriculum development involves the selection of tasks with regard to learning objectives, bridging the gap between performing a task and learning how to perform it, development of tests to screen personnel and to determine how much was learned, finding the ability levels of trainees, and setting of course sequences according to learning objectives.

IPISD. Phase 3. Develop

The volume outlines important procedures in developing interservice training effectiveness. Elements emphasized are setting guidelines for learning objectives, obtaining instructional cost effectiveness by mixing media, using existing proven materials or devising new ones, evaluating existing materials for appropriateness, developing new instruction where necessary, and validating all instructional materials.

IPISD. Phase 4 and 5. Implementation and Control

The implementation phase of interservice training involves providing guidelines for classroom management, designing teaching methods which include self-paced instruction, determining whether the instructional effort has accomplished the intended aims and providing good data upon which to base training decisions, external evaluation to find how well trained students are doing their jobs after course completion and job placement, and setting up a system for revising the training methodology in case of doctrine changes or discovery of instruction deficiencies.


References

  • Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., & King, F. J. (1975). Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Executive Summary and Model [Final report, 25 Jun 1973-31 Dec 1975]. FLORIDA STATE UNIV TALLAHASSEE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA019486.pdf
  • Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., & King, F. J. (1975). Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Phase 1. Analyze [Final report, 25 Jun 1973-31 Dec 1975] (ADA019487). FLORIDA STATE UNIV TALLAHASSEE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA019487.pdf
  • Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., & King, F. J. (1975). Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Phase 2. Design [Final report, 25 Jun 1973-31 Dec 1975] (ADA019488). FLORIDA STATE UNIV TALLAHASSEE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA019488.pdf
  • Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., & King, F. J. (1975). Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Phase 3. Develop [Final report, 25 Jun 1973-31 Dec 1975] (ADA019489). FLORIDA STATE UNIV TALLAHASSEE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA019489.pdf
  • Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., & King, F. J. (1975). Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Phase 4 and 5. Implement and Control [Final report, 25 Jun 1973-31 Dec 1975] (ADA019490). FLORIDA STATE UNIV TALLAHASSEE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA019490.pdf